Search for: All records

Abstract Multiple stable equilibria are intrinsic to many complex dynamical systems, and have been identified in a hierarchy of climate models. Motivated by the idea that the Quaternary glacial–interglacial cycles could have resulted from orbitally forced transitions between multiple stable states mediated by internal feedbacks, this study investigates the existence and mechanisms of multiple equilibria in an idealized, energy-conserving atmosphere–ocean–sea ice general circulation model with a fully coupled carbon cycle. Four stable climates are found for identical insolation and global carbon inventory: an ice-free Warm climate, two intermediate climates (Cold and Waterbelt), and a fully ice-covered Snowball climate. A fifth state, a small ice cap state between Warm and Cold, is found to be barely unstable. Using custom radiative kernels and a thorough sampling of the model’s internal variability, three equilibria are investigated through the state dependence of radiative feedback processes. For fast feedbacks, the systematic decrease in surface albedo feedback from Cold to Warm states is offset by a similar increase in longwave water vapor feedback. At longer time scales, the key role of the carbon cycle is a dramatic lengthening of the adjustment time comparable to orbital forcings near the Warm state. The dynamics of the coupled climate–carbon system are thus not well separated in time from orbital forcings, raising interesting possibilities for nonlinear triggers for large climate changes. Significance Statement How do carbon cycle and other physical processes affect the physical and mathematical properties of the climate system? We use a complex climate model coupled with a carbon cycle to simulate the climate evolution under different initial conditions. Four stable climate states are possible, from the Snowball Earth, in which ice covers the whole planet, to the Warm state, an ice-free world. The carbon cycle drives the global climate change at an extremely slower pace after sea ice retreats. Sea ice and water vapor, on the other hand, constitute the major contributing factors that accelerate faster climate change. 

Abstract This paper examines the processes that drive Arctic anomalous surface warming and sea ice loss during winter-season tropospheric energy flux events, synoptic periods of increased tropospheric energy flux convergence ( F trop ), using the NASA MERRA-2 reanalysis. During an event, a poleward anomaly in F trop initially increases the sensible and latent energy of the Arctic troposphere; as the warm and moist troposphere loses heat, the anomalous energy source is balanced by a flux upward across the tropopause and a downward net surface flux. A new metric for the Arctic surface heating efficiency ( E trop ) is defined, which measures the fraction of the energy source that reaches the surface. Composites of high-, medium-, and low-efficiency events help identify key physical factors, including the vertical structure of F trop and Arctic surface preconditioning. In high-efficiency events ( E trop ≥ 0.63), a bottom-heavy poleward F trop occurs in the presence of an anomalously warm and unstratified Arctic—a consequence of decreased sea ice—resulting in increased vertical mixing, enhanced near-surface warming and moistening, and further sea ice loss. Smaller E trop , and thus weaker surface impacts, are found in events with anomalously large initial sea ice extent and more vertically uniform F trop . These differences in E trop are manifested primarily through turbulent heat fluxes rather than downward longwave radiation. The frequency of high-efficiency events has increased from the period 1980–99 to the period 2000–19, contributing to Arctic surface warming and sea ice decline. 

While most models agree that the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) becomes weaker under greenhouse gas emission and is likely to weaken over the twenty-first century, they disagree on the projected magnitudes of AMOC weakening. In this work, CMIP6 models with stronger climatological AMOC are shown to project stronger AMOC weakening in both 1% ramping CO₂and abrupt CO₂quadrupling simulations. A physical interpretation of this result is developed. For models with stronger mean state AMOC, stratification in the upper Labrador Sea is weaker, allowing for stronger mixing of the surface buoyancy flux. In response to CO₂increase, surface warming is mixed to the deeper Labrador Sea in models with stronger upper-ocean mixing. This subsurface warming and corresponding density decrease drives AMOC weakening through advection from the Labrador Sea to the subtropics via the deep western boundary current. Time series analysis shows that most CMIP6 models agree that the decrease in subsurface Labrador Sea density leads AMOC weakening in the subtropics by several years. Also, idealized experiments conducted in an ocean-only model show that the subsurface warming over 500–1500 m in the Labrador Sea leads to stronger AMOC weakening several years later, while the warming that is too shallow (<500 m) or too deep (>1500 m) in the Labrador Sea causes little AMOC weakening. These results suggest that a better representation of mean state AMOC is necessary for narrowing the intermodel uncertainty of AMOC weakening to greenhouse gas emission and its corresponding impacts on future warming projections.

 

This study quantifies the contribution to Arctic winter surface warming from changes in the tropospheric energy transport (F_trop) and the efficiency with whichF_tropheats the surface in the RCP8.5 warming scenario of the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble. A metric for this efficiency,E_trop, measures the fraction of anomalousF_tropthat is balanced by an anomalous net surface flux (NSF). Drivers ofE_tropare identified in synoptic‐scale events during whichF_tropis the dominant driver of NSF.E_tropis sensitive to the vertical structure ofF_tropand pre‐existing Arctic lower‐tropospheric stability (LTS). In RCP8.5, winter‐meanF_tropdecreases from 95.1 to 85.4 W m⁻², whileE_tropincreases by 5.7%, likely driven by decreased Arctic LTS, indicating an increased coupling betweenF_tropand the surface energy budget. The net impact of decreasingF_tropand increasing efficiency is a positive 0.7 W m⁻²contribution to winter‐season surface heating.

 

Abstract The flux of moist static energy into the polar regions plays a key role in the energy budget and climate of the polar regions. While usually studied from a vertically integrated perspective ( F wall ), this analysis examines its vertical structure, using the NASA-MERRA-2 reanalysis to compute climatological and anomalous fluxes of sensible, latent, and potential energy across 70°N and 65°S for the period 1980–2016. The vertical structure of the climatological flux is bimodal, with peaks in the middle to lower troposphere and middle to upper stratosphere. The near-zero flux at the tropopause defines the boundary between stratospheric ( F strat ) and tropospheric ( F trop ) contributions to F wall . Especially at 70°N, F strat is found to be important to the climatology and variability of F wall , contributing 20.9 W m −2 to F wall (19% of F wall ) during the winter and explaining 23% of the variance of F wall . During winter, an anomalous poleward increase in F strat preceding a sudden stratospheric warming is followed by an increase in outgoing longwave radiation anomalies, with little influence on the surface energy budget of the Arctic. Conversely, a majority of the energy input by an anomalous poleward increase in F trop goes toward warming the Arctic surface. Overall, F trop is found to be a better metric than F wall for evaluating the influence of atmospheric circulations on the Arctic surface climate.